TRaCK: Tropical Rivers and Coastal Knowledge

Science and knowledge that governments, communities, industries for sustainable use of Australia's tropical rivers and estuaries

Temporal and spatial variation in ecosystem metabolism and food web carbon transfer in a wet-dry tropical river

TitleTemporal and spatial variation in ecosystem metabolism and food web carbon transfer in a wet-dry tropical river
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2012
AuthorsHunt, RJ, Jardine, TD, Hamilton, SK, Bunn, SE
JournalFreshwater Biology
Start Page435
Date Published03/2012
ISSN1365-2427 (Online)
Keywordsfloodplain;oligotrophic;primary production;respiration;stable isotope analysis

1. High light availability and stable base flow during the dry season promote primary production in perennial rivers of the wet–dry tropics, in contrast to production during the wet season which is often limited by turbidity and scouring. The Mitchell River of northern Queensland (Australia) was studied to understand controls on aquatic production and respiration in the dry season in relation to spatial and temporal gradients of light and temperature.

2. At three sites along the river, whole-ecosystem gross primary production (GPP) and respiration (ER) were measured from diel changes of dissolved oxygen using the open-channel single station method. Using stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis, aquatic consumers and their potential basal food resources were also assessed to determine food web relationships at the beginning and end of the dry season.

3. Nutrient limitation of aquatic net primary production was implied from the oligotrophic conditions and high algal C:N ratios. Rates of GPP were comparable with other tropical and temperate rivers and were regulated by light availability.

4. Respiration rates were high and similar to other tropical and subtropical rivers. Up to 52% of temporal variation of ER was explained by temperature, while P/R was lowest at the downstream site.

5. Benthic algae were the major carbon source for primary and secondary benthic consumers (insects) in the dry season but not for higher consumers (fish and crustaceans). Despite high rates of ER, which were probably supported by decaying terrestrial C3 plant material, this carbon source was not identified as contributing to animal consumer biomass.

6. While benthic algal production in the dry season sustained benthic invertebrates, the importance of external subsidies of carbon along the river, probably from the floodplain, was emphasised for fish and large invertebrates, which evidently were feeding on carbon sources not present in channel waterholes during the dry season.